In a world filled with daily decisions, from the minor to the monumental, we often operate under the assumption that there is a “right” choice—a path that aligns with some objective truth. But what if that assumption is flawed? What if the situations we face and the choices we make are shaped more by our own perceptions than by any external reality? This question lies at the heart of a complex intersection between metaphysics, mathematics, and decision theory, an area of inquiry that challenges our understanding of free will, responsibility, and truth itself.

How Perception Shapes Our Reality

Philosophers have long debated the nature of reality. In metaphysics, questions about what’s “real” underscore that our understanding of any situation is inherently subjective, filtered through our unique perspectives and biases. Professor Jessica Collins, who I actually think is a great reference when discussing the interplay between metaphysics, mathematics, and decision theory, suggests that our perception of reality is deeply personal and that no two people see the same situation in precisely the same way. According to Collins, our interpretation of reality impacts the choices we see as available or viable, raising the question: if our choices are based on a subjective reality, can any one choice be considered objectively “correct”?

Mathematics and the Search for Universal Truths

Mathematics has often been regarded as the purest form of objective truth—a field grounded in logical certainty and consistency. When it comes to decision-making, mathematics offers models and formulas that imply there’s an optimal or correct choice. However, Professor Collins challenges this perspective, arguing that mathematical models only provide idealized frameworks. While these models are useful for identifying patterns, they may not account for the nuances of personal perception and subjective realities. If each individual’s understanding of a situation is colored by personal experience and interpretation, then the mathematical “best choice” may not apply equally to everyone.

Decision Theory: A Framework for Making Choices

Traditionally, decision theory offers tools for determining the “rational” or “optimal” decision, often based on probability, utility, and risk assessment. Decision theory assumes that individuals approach choices rationally and that situations are objective—two assumptions that Collins questions. In her research, she highlights how cognitive biases and personal perspectives can alter how we frame choices, making even “rational” decisions context-dependent. This suggests that the “correct” choice may vary, depending not just on external factors but on an individual’s internal interpretation of the situation.